Let me tell you what just happened because it matters more than the headlines are saying.
Yesterday (June
12th), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of a student with epilepsy who was getting less instruction than her peers because of her disability.
Her name is Ava.
Her
seizures make mornings impossible.
Her old school adjusted her schedule. Her new one refused.
So while her classmates got 6+ hours of instruction, Ava got just over 4.
Her parents tried everything.
Meetings. Emails. Requests.
And when nothing changed, they filed a lawsuit under the ADA and Section 504.
The lower courts told them: Unless the school acted in bad faith, it doesn’t count.
Read that again.
They didn’t say the school did the right thing.
They just said the bar to prove harm was too high.
But on June 12, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that families don’t have to prove schools acted out of malice. Just that they ignored the child’s needs.
That’s called deliberate indifference. And it matters.
Because for decades, families have had to prove harm like they were on trial while schools got the benefit of the doubt
You could be dismissed not because your child wasn’t harmed but because you couldn’t prove someone intended to hurt them.
Now? That bar just got lower. And fairer.
Here’s why this ruling matters for you:
• It
validates what you’ve felt for years: when schools do nothing, that is a choice.
• It shifts the focus from excuses to impact because harm still hurts, even if it wasn’t “on purpose.”
• And it gives you language and legal backing to name what’s happening without being labeled “too sensitive” or “too
demanding.”